When I read books, I circle words I don’t know and look them
up later. In the 304 pages of Bloom’s
book, I ended up circling 81 words. I
looked them all up and have listed them below with definitions almost all from
Merriam-Webster’s dictionary. Words from
the multitude of quotes included in the text are in italics with the author
being quoted in parenthesis after the page number. I am left to ponder who is most revealed by
this, Bloom’s intellect, my ignorance, or something else about both of us.
From Merriam-Webster:
abnegates p21 – deny, renounce, surrender, relinquish
*adagia p176 – the title of an annotated collection of
Greek and Latin proverbs during the Renaissance by Dutch humanist Desiderius
Erasums – love feast
Aesthetic p203 – of, or relating to, art or beauty; of,
relating to, or dealing with aesthetics or the beautiful
agon p42 – conflict, especially: a the dramatic conflict
between the chief characters in a literary work
antiphony p81 – responsive alternation between two groups
especially of singers
antithetical p228 – directly opposite or opposed;
constituting or marked by antithesis; being in direct and unequivocal
opposition
aphoristic p 161 aphorism p165 – a concise statement of a
principle; a terse formulation of a truth or sentiment
apothegm p176 – a short, pithy and instructive saying or
formulation; aphorism
apposition p133 – a grammatical construction in which two
unusually adjacent nouns having the same referent stand in the same syntactical
relation to the rest of the sentence 9a the poet and Burns is “a biography of
the poet Burns”); the deposition of
successive layers upon those already present (as in cell walls)
ascetic p 227 – relating to or having a strict and simple
way of living that avoids physical pleasure, practicing strict self-denial as a
measure of personal and especially spiritual discipline; austere in appearance,
manner, or attitude
assiduity p6
(Hillel) - Diligence, persistent personal attention
bathetic p102 – from bathos – the sudden appearance of a
silly ideal or event in a book triteness, sentimentalism
cant p187 – lively, lustily
contemn p177 – to view or treat with contempt; scorn
daimon p50 – demon
demiurge p54 (Solmsen) – a Platonic subordinate deity
who fashions the sensible world in the light of eternal ideas; a Gnostic
subordinate deity who is the creator of the material world; one that is an
autonomous creative force or decisive power
diachronic p172 – of, relating to, or dealing with phenomena
(as lf language or culture) as they occur or change over a period of time
dissimulation p156 – to hide under a false appearance
*elegist p171 – the author of a mournful poem lamenting the
dead ; (elegiac p 174 – resembling or characteristic of or appropriate to an
elegy; expressing sorrow often for something past)
Equivocal p196 – having two or more possible meanings; not
easily understood or explained; a subject to two or more interpretations and
usually used to mislead or confuse;
subject to two or more interpretations and usually used to mislead or
confuse
enigmatic p154 – full of mystery and difficult to understand
esoteric p289 – only taught to or understood by members of a
special group; hard to understand’; limited to a small number of people
excogitation p179 – to think out; devise
exegete p175 – one who practices exegesis (an explanation or
critical interpretation of a text)
exotericism p149, exoteric p160 – only taught to or
understood by members of a special group; hard to understand; limited to a
small number of people; of special, rare, or unusual interest
expurgating p56 – to cleanse of something morally harmful,
offensive, or erroneous; to expunge objectionable parts from before publication
or presentation
familial p181 – of or relating to a family; tending to occur
in more members of a family than expected by chance alone
fecundity p168 – intellectually productive or inventive to a
marked degree; fruitful in offspring or vegetation; prolific; producing or able
to produce many babies, young animals, or plants
fecund p253 – producing or able to produce many babies,
young animals , or plants; fruitful in offspring or vegetation; prolific;
intellectually productive or inventive to a marked degree
gnomic p278 – said or written using few words that are
difficult to understand; characterized by aphorism; given to the composition of
gnomic writhing
gnosticism [gnostic]
p 45, [278] – the thought and practice especially of various cults of
late pre-Christian and early Christian centuries distinguished by the
conviction that matter is evil and that emancipation come through gnosis
(esoteric knowledge of spiritual truth)
gnosis p115 – esoteric (only taught or understood by members
of a special group ; hard to understand ) knowledge of spiritual truth held by
the ancient Gnostics to be essential to salvation
groggy (groggily adverb) p184 – not able to think or move
normally because of being tired, sick, etc., weak and unsteady on the feet or
in action
hagridden p268
(Proust) – harass, torment
Hermetism [hermetic] p 121 – closed tightly so that no air
can go in or out; of or relating to the mystical and alchemical writings or
teaching arising in the first three centuries A. D. and attributed to Hermes
Trismegistus; relating to or characterized by occultism or abstruseness
heterodox p53 – not agreeing with established beliefs or
standards, contrary, holding unorthodox opinions or doctrines
Historicists [historicists] p118 – a theory, doctrine, or
style that emphasizes the importance of history; a theory in which history is
seen as a standard of value or as a determinant of events, a style c(as in
architecture) characterized by the use of traditional forms and elements
Idols p163 (Bacon)
a greatly loved or admired person; a picture or object that is worshipped as a
god
Instauration p160 – restoration after decay, lapse, or
dilapidation; an act of instituting or establishing something; [Instaurator
p166] – one who renews or restores a former condition
Irremediable p271
(Proust) – not able to be repaired or corrected; not remediable; incurable
Kenosis p200 – the relinquishment of divine attributes by
Jesus Christ in becoming human
Magus p160 – a member of a hereditary priestly class among
the ancient Medes and Persians; (plural – magi as in wise men)
Miscellany p183 – a mixture of different things; separate
writing collected in one volume; a collection of writing on various subjects; a
mixture of various things
misprision p281 – neglect or wrong performance of official
duty; concealment of treason or felony by one who is not a participant in the
treason or felony; seditious conduct against the government or the courts
mnemotechnics(sp) p226
(Nietzsche) – of or relating to or involved the practice of aiding the
memory
monist p 43 – a view that there is only one kind of ultimate
substance; a viewpoint or theory that reduces all phenomena to one principle
mordant p178 – expressing harsh criticism especially in a
way that is funny
nihilism p116 –a doctrine that denies any objective ground
of truth and especially of moral truths; the belief that traditional morals,
ideas, beliefs, etc. have no worth or value, senseless and useless; the belief
that a society’s political and social institutions are so bad that they should
be destroyed;
obtuse p226
(Nietzsche) stupid or unintelligent; not able to think clearly or to understand
what is obvious or simple; mathematics: not ending in a sharp point, measuring
between 90 and 180 degrees
*palabars and hechos p93 – [Spanish for “actions and facts”]
pathos p186 – a quality that causes people to feel sympathy
and sadness; an element in experience or in artistic representation evoking
pity or compassion; an emotion of sympathetic pity
paucity p137 – smallness of number, fewness, dearth
perturbation p 164
(Bacon) a change in the normal state or regular movement of something; a state
of being worried or upset
plangent p160 – having a loud reverberating sound; having an
expressive and especially plaintive quality
*Pelasgian p212 (Emerson) – A member of a people living
in the region of the Aegean Sea before the coming of the Greeks
polemic p32 – a strong written or spoken attack against
someone else’s opinions, beliefs, practices, etc.
*politiques p156
(Bacon) – [French for involved in politics]
preternatural p81 – very unusual in a way that does not seem
natural; existing outside of nature
primordial p234 – existing from the beginning of time; very
ancient; first created or developed; existing in or persisting from the
beginning; earliest formed in the growth of an individual or organ; primitive
profligacy p209 – the quality of being profligate,
(carelessly and foolishly wasting money, materials, ext.; very wasteful
prudential p187 – having or showing careful good judgment;
of, relating to, or proceeding from prudence; exercising prudence especially in
business matters
pugnaciously [pugnacious] p130 – having a quarrelsome or
combative nature
quietist (quietism) p 139 – a system of religious mysticism
teaching that perfection and spiritual peace are attained by annihilation of
the will and passive absorption in contemplation of God and divine things;
passive withdrawn attitude or policy toward th3e world or worldly affairs; a
state of calmness or passivity
sciatica p222 (W
.E. D. Du Bois) – pain in the lower back, hip, and especially the back of the
thigh that is caused by pressure on the sciatic nerve
solipsism p87 – a theory holding that the self can know
nothing but its own modifications and that the self is the only existent thing;
extreme egocentrism
sublimity (sublime) p147 – lofty, grand, or exalted in
thought, expression, or manner; of outstanding spiritual, intellectual, or
moral worth
synecdoche p172 – a figure of speech by which a part is put
for the whole (as fifty sail for fifty ships0, the whole for a part (as society
of high society), the species for the genus (as cutthroat for assassin), the
genus for the species (as a creature for a man), or the name of the material
for the thing made 9 as boards for stage)
teleological p255 – exhibiting or relating to design or
purpose especially in nature
tendentious p157 – strongly favoring a particular point of
view in a way that may cause argument; expressing a strong opinion; marked by a
tendency in favor of a particular point of view
theomorphic p123 – having the divine aspect
topos p 253 – a traditional or conventional literary or
rhetorical theme or topic
tropes p139 – a word or phrase, or image used in a new and different
way in order to create an artistic effect; a word or expression used in a
figurative sense; figure of speech; a common or overused theme or device;
cliché
unseam p123 – to open the seams of
vicissitudes p 244 – the quality or state of being
changeable; mutability’ natural change or mutation visible in nature or in
human affairs; a favorable or unfavorable event or situation that occurs by
chance; a difficulty or hardship attendant on a way of life; alternating
change; succession
vitalism p200 – a doctrine that the functions of a living
organism are due to a vital principle distinct from physicochemical forces; a
doctrine that the processes of life are not explicable by the laws of physics
and chemistry alone and that life is some part self-determining
wen p207
(Montaigne) – an abnormal growth or a cyst protruding from a surface especially
of the skin
*Note: Not from Merriam-Webster
I like some of the following quotes very much – agree with
them and find them supportive of my own thoughts. Others I disagree with very much and quote
them as examples of the modern intellectualism which I believe is a threat to
our minds and our humanity. I will
append comments after some; which I will enclose in brackets. Each quote has a title as a sort of
introduction in my words. These introductions
are bolded. Quotes that are from other authors, cited by Bloom, will be in
italics and followed by the name of the original author.
All quotes are from the 2004 edition published by the
Penguin Group in New York.
1. Who was the writer
of the Bible? “We know that the Five
Books of Moses were not composed by Moses, and the Hebrews presumably knew this
also.” pp. 11-12
2. Bloom’s need to Place
a woman in the “Authors List”. “I
have some doubts as to the nation and creed of the wisdom writer who composed
Job, just as I hold to my prior surmise that the J writer of the Hebrew Bible
might well have been a Hittite woman.” p. 12 [I hold that this is Bloom’s 21st
century political correctness run amuck.]
3. The Sources of
Melville’s Moby – Dick. “Behemoth and Leviathan plainly represent the
sanctified tyranny of nature over men. “ p. 15 [I believe this is represented
in Moby-Dick, which I read as man’s necessary but futile struggle to master
nature, his tragic duty which he can neither escape or accomplish.]
3. The Theme of the Book.
“But where shall wisdom be found? and
where is the place of understanding?”
Man knoweth not the
price thereof; neither is it found in the land of the living.” Job 28 p. 20
4. Nothing New Under
the Son. “The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is
done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.” Ecclesiastes 1 pp. 24-25
5. On Modern Education. “At our dreadful moment in education, the Iliad and the Odyssey are not as universally taught as in my youth, but they
remain far more widely studied than are the Symposium
and the Republic. p. 37
6. The Influence of Ancient
Ideas. “And yet our
cognition—science and technology, as well as philosophy—is Greek, as is our
aesthetic, though not altogether.
Religion and morality, despite the long tradition of Christian
Platonism, will remain Hebraic-Christian-Islamic, though perhaps increasingly
Platonized.” pp. 50-51 [First, I do not believe that human minds are divided as
Bloom indicates, nor that our thoughts or our morality are generated by one
geographic mind set or another. I also
see very little that is Hebraic, Christian, or Islamic in enlightened thought;
thank God. ]
7. The Lover of Truth
Can Never Possess It – We Only Know We Cannot Know. “. . . the philosopher knows that he cannot reach his model and will
never be entirely that which he desires.” p. 59 (Hadot)
8. The Power of
Homer’s Poetry. “The poems of Homer
and his contemporaries were the delight of infant Greece; they were the
elements of that social system which is the column upon which all succeeding
civilization has repose. Homer embodied
the ideal perfection of his age in human character; nor can we doubt that those
who read his verses were awakened to an ambition of becoming like to Achilles,
Hector, and Ulysses: the truth and beauty of friendship, patriotism, and
persevering devotion to an object, were unveiled to their depths in these
immortal creations: the sentiments of the auditors must have been refined and
enlarged by a sympathy with such great and lovely impersonations, until from
admiring they imitated, and from imitation they identified themselves with the
objects of their admiration. “ p. 63 (Shelly)
9. On Memorizing (the
Iliad). “That Homer was memorized
and so became the major source of later Greek popular thinking is indisputable,
but the author of the Iliad was
rather more than an encyclopedist.” p. 65
10. On Memorizing (Poetry). “After half a century of teaching poetry, I
have come to believe that I must urge my better students to possess great poems
by memory. Choose a poem that finds you, as Coleridge says, and read
it deeply and often, out loud to yourself and to others. Internalizing the poems of Shakespeare,
Milton, Whitman will teach you to think more comprehensively than Plato can.” p. 66 [Why must we choose? Isn’t there equal value in the “poetry” of
Plato as in others one might choose?]
11. The New Testament
Is Greek in Tenor. “Simon Weil, who
loved both the Iliad and the Gospels, rather oddly associated
them, as though Jesus had been a Greek and not a Jew: The
Gospels are the last marvelous expression of the Greek genius, as the Iliad is
the first . . .” p. 70 [This is not odd at all. The writers of the New Testament wrote in Greek Letters their Hellenized thoughts.]
12. On Melville’s
Ahab and Moby-Dick. “Herman Melville
blended Don Quixote and Hamlet in Captain Ahab (with a touch of Milton’s Satan
added for seasoning). Ahab desires to
avenge himself upon the White Whale, while Satan would destroy God, if only he
could.” p. 84 [I don’t think Bloom
understands Ahab or tragic heroes in general.
The necessary battle of man against nature is ill compared to Satan’s
quest for Glory; even though both are fated to rail against the unassailable.]
13. On the Truth,
from Don Quixote. “What I can tell your grace is that it deals
with truths, and they are truths so appealing and elegant that no lies can
equal them.” P.95 (Cervantes)
14. On Reading. “We read, I think, to repair our solitude,
though pragmatically the better we read, the more solitary we become. I cannot regard reading as a vice, but then
also it is not a virtue. Thinking in
Hegel is one thing; in Goethe, it is quite another. Hegel is not a wisdom writer; Goethe is. The deepest motive for reading has to be the
quest for wisdom.” p. 107 [I don’t get his sentence: “I cannot regard reading as a vice, but then
also it is not a virtue.” I think he is
once more trying to maintain his relativist credentials. Surely there are writers whose works are a
waste of time – their short-comings do not convict all reading.]
15. On Our First
Breath. “. . . we came crying hither: Thou know’st the first time we smell the
air We wawl and cry.” P. 113 (Book of Job)
“When we are born, we
cry that we are come To this great stage of fools.” P. 113 (Shakespeare)
16. On Marxist Abuse
of Nihilists (Destroyers). Hegelians of the Left—Marx and the Russians
culminating in Lenin and Trotsky—carried nihilism into terrorism and class
revolution; but Schopenhauer returned to Fichte’s Romantic idealism, and thus
begat the Dionysiac Nietzsche, who is now claimed by antinihilists and
nihilists alike.” p. 117
17. On Who’s the Best,
According to Bloom. The personal
essay is Montaigne’s, as the drama is Shakespeare’s, the epic is Homer’s,
and the novel forever Cervantes’s. p. 127
18. Montaigne on How
Silly It Would Be to Be Judged for Eternity on This Life. “It would be an
injustice to have cut short its [man’s life’s] resources and powers; to have
disarmed it, and to pass judgment and a sentence of infinity and perpetual
duration upon it, for the time of its captivity and imprisonment, its weakness
and illness, the time when it was forced and constrained; and to stop at the consideration
of so short a time, perhaps one or two hours, or at worst a century, which is
no more in proportion to infinity than an instant; in order, from this moment
of interval, to decide and dispose definitively of its whole existence. It would be an inequitable disproportion to
receive eternal compensation in consequence of so short a life.” p. 140 (Montaigne)
19. Montaigne on
Socrates #1. “It happened fortunately
that the man most worthy to be known and to be presented to the world as an
example should be the one of whom we have the most certain knowledge. We have light on him from the most
clear-sighted men who ever lived; the witnesses we have of him are wonderful in
fidelity and competence.” pp. 143-144 (Montaigne)
20. Montaigne on
Socrates #2. “By
these vulgar and natural motives, by these ordinary and common ideas, without
excitement or fuss, he [Socrates] constructed not only the best regulated but
the loftiest and most vigorous beliefs, actions, and morals that ever
were. It is he who brought human wisdom
back down from heaven, where she was wasting her time, and restored her to man,
with whom lies her most proper and laborious and useful business. See him plead before his judges, see by what reasonings
he rouses his courage in the hazards of
war, what arguments fortify his patience against calumny, tyranny, death, and
his wife’s bad temper. There is nothing
borrowed from art and the sciences; even the simplest can recognize in him
their means and their strength; it is impossible to go back further and
lower. He did a great favor to human
nature by showing how much it can do by itself.” p. 144 (Montaigne)
21. Montaigne on
Living. There is nothing so beautiful
and legitimate as to play the man well and properl,y no knowledge so hard to
acquire as the knowledge of how to live life well and naturally; and the most
barbarous of our maladies is to despise our being.” P. 146 (Montaigne)
22. Horace on
Obedience to the Gods. “Since you obey the gods, you rule the world.” p. 148 (Horace)
23. Horace on the
Good Life. “Grant me but health, Latona’s son, And to enjoy the wealth I’ve won,
And honored age, with mind entire And not unsolaced by the lyre.” p. 149 (Horace)
24. Bacon On the
Inability of Man’s Senses or Mind to Measure the Universe; An Indictment of Modern “Science". “For it
is a false assertion that the sense of man is the measure of things. On the contrary, all perceptions as well of
the sense as of the mind are according to the measure of the individual and not
according to the measure of the universe.
And the human understanding is like a false mirror; which, receiving
rays irregularly, distorts and discolors the nature of things by mingling its
own nature with it.” p. 163 (Bacon)
25. Bacon On the
Danger of Words and the Power of Words. “And
therefore the ill and unfit choice of words wonderfully obstructs the
understanding. Nor do the definitions or
explanations wherewith in some things learned men are wont to guard and defend
themselves, by any means set the matter right.
But words plainly force and overrule the understanding, and throw all
into confusion, and lead men away into numberless empty controversies and idle
fancies.” P. 164
26. Bacon On the
Idols of the Theater – [A Commentary on Global Warming’s Pseudo “Science”]. “These
I call the Theatre because in my judgment all the received systems are but so
many stage plays, representing worlds of their own creation after an unreal and
scenic fashion. Nor is it only of the
systems now in vogue, or only of the ancient sects and philosophies, that I
speak; for many more plays of the same kind may yet be composed and in like
artificial manner set forth, seeing that errors the most widely different have
nevertheless causes for the most part alike.
Neither again do I mean this only of entire systems, but also of many
principles and axioms in science, which by tradition, credulity, and negligence
have come to be received.” pp. 164-165 (Bacon)
27. On the Value of Writing
by Samuel Johnson. “The only end of writing is to enable the
reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it.” p. 187 (Johnson)
28. Modern
Universities Do Not Require Reading. “And
yet Johnson is a great teacher, particularly at a time when the “common
reader,” who he exalted, is beginning to vanish, and when the mediaversity
barely teaches most students to read better books, or to read them more
closely.” p. 188
29. Emerson’s Call for
Relativism. “I dare attempt to lay out my own road That which myself delights in
shall be Good That which I do not want, --indifferent, That which I hate is
Bad. That’s flat Henceforth, please God,
Forever I forego The yoke of men’s opinions.” p. 214 (Emerson)
30. Can America Be
the New Rome? “[On Emerson’s writing
on freedom.] Huge as the journals are, they need to be read complete, because
Emerson’s mind has become the mind of America.
I am aware that this is not always a good thing, now that a self-reliant
United States bids to become a twenty-first-century version of the Roman
Empire.” P. 218 [I rejoice at the
thought that the U. S. might be the new Roman Empire. The world is better for Rome and will forever
be better thanks to the United States of America.]
31. Emerson on
Thought and Freedom. “Intellect annuls Fate. So far as a man thinks, he is free.” p.
221 (Emerson)
32. A Call for
Teachers. “How can one create a memory for the human animal? How can on impress something upon this partly
obtuse, partly flighty mind, attuned only to the passing moment, in such a way
that it will stay there?” p. 226
(Nietzsche)
33. On the Ancient
Religion – Human Sacrifice, the Death of the Sacred King. “Man
could never do without blood, torture, and sacrifices when he felt the need to
create a memory for himself; the most dreadful sacrifices and pledges
(sacrifices of the first-born among them), the most repulsive mutilations (castration,
for example), the cruelest rites of all the religious cults (and all religions
are at the deepest level systems of cruelties)—all this has its origin in the
instinct that realized that pain is the most powerful aid to mnemonics.” P. 227 (Nietzsche)
34. On Freud – His Importance
Up, Psychoanalysis Down. “We live
more than ever in the Age of Freud, despite the relative decline that
psychoanalysis has begun to suffer as a public institution and as a medical
specialty. Freud’s universal and
comprehensive theory of the mind probably will outlive the psychoanalytical
therapy, and seems already to have placed him with Plato and Montaigne and
Shakespeare rather than with the scientists he overtly aspired to emulate.
This is not to suggest that Freud was primarily a
philosopher or a poet, but rather that his influence has been analogous to that
of Plato, Montaigne, Shakespeare: inescapable, immense, almost
incalculable. In some sense, we are all
Freudians, whether we want to b or not.”
P. 238 [BUNK!!!!!]
35. The Truth about
Psychoanalytical Therapy. “His
[Freud’s] Viennese contemporary the satirist Karl Kraus bitterly observed that
psychoanalysis itself was the mental illness or spiritual disease of which it
purported to be the cure. This remains,
I [Bloom] think, the most destructive
remark that Freud ever has provoked, because it centers on what is most
problematic in his writing and in his therapy, the intimately related ideas of
authority and transference.” p.239 [Down
with Freud; his pronouncements are tottering and demonstrated ridicules. Kraus’ comment is powerful because it is true.]
36. On Leviathan –
Think Moby-Dick. “Leviathan in the
Book of Job is God’s king over all the children of pride, and yet God answers
Job’s questions as to why evil afflicts the virtuous only with a series of
rhetorical questions that affirm the sanctified tyranny of nature over all of
us. We can make no covenant with
Leviathan, who at last will be death, our death.” P. 247 [Man, Ahab, fights even against
death. It is the nature of man – and his
destiny.]
37. On the Loss of
Learning. “Cultural guilt has
become far more conscious among us than it tended to be in Freud’s Vienna,
indeed so much so that our higher learning of a humanist kind is ebbing away,
almost as a kind of sacrifice for what we take to be our implication in
societal tyrannies and exploitations.” p. 249
38. On Love and
Jealousy. “Jealousy dies with love,
but only with respect to the former beloved.”
p. 261 [Perhaps, but the hate that survives the death of love is often endless
and terrible to behold.]
39. Freud’s Voodoo
Reveled in His Own Words. “The
female sex develops an Oedipus-complex, too, a super-ego and a latency
period. May one ascribe to it also a
phallic organization and a castration complex?
The answer is in the affirmative, but it cannot be the same as in the
boy. The feministic demand for equal
rights between the sexes does not carry far here; the morphological difference
must express itself in differences in the development of the mind. “Anatomy is Destiny,” to vary a saying of
Napoleon’s [Freud died too soon to quote Hitler.]. The little girl’s clitoris
behaves at first just like a penis, but by comparing herself with a boy
play-fellow the child perceives that she has “come off short,” and takes this
fact as ill-treatment and as a reason for feeling inferior. For a time she still consoles herself with
the expectation that later, when she grows up, she will acquire just as big an
appendage as a boy. Here the woman’s
“masculine complex: branches off. The
female child does not understand her actual loss as a sex characteristic, but
explains it by assuming that at some earlier date she had possessed a member
which was just as big and which had later been lost by castration. She does not seem to extend this conclusion
about herself to other grown women, but in complete accordance with the phallic
phase she ascribes to them large and complete, that is, male, genitalia. The result is an essential difference between
her and the boy, namely, that she accepts castration as an established fact, an
operational already performed, whereas the boy dreads the possibility of its
being performed. pp. 272-273
40. On Religious War. “The twenty-first century may be dominated by
religious war between some elements in Islam and an emerging alliance of
Hindus, Jews, and Christians.” p. 292
[There may be such an alliance, but we should not leave out the forces of China
– who should also fear Islamic fanaticism.
More importantly, it will not be arms but the power of reason,
in-other-words, the power of human thought that will make the most effective
defense against fanatic superstition.]
41. Rome and the
United States; the United States as Rome. “Whether the United States in its role as the
new Roman Empire will enforce a Roman peace, or fall eventually as Rome fell,
its potential history and defense is prefigured in Augustine’s City of God.” p. 293
42. On the Importance
of Reading. “We think because we
learn to remember our reading the best that can be read—for Augustine the Bible
and Vergil, Cicero and the Neoplatonists, to which we have added for ourselves
Plato, Dante, Cervantes, and Shakespeare, with Joyce and Proust in this century
just past [Dump Joyce and Proust – I would add Melville and Tolkien.] But always we remain the progeny of
Augustine, who first told us that the book alone could nourish thought, memory,
and their intricate interplay in the life of the mind. Reading alone will not save us or make us
wise, but without it we will lapse into the death-in-life of the dumbing down
in which American now leads the world, as in all other matters. pp. 298-299
43. On Wisdom and
Truth – Bloom’s Conclusion. “Truth,
according to the poet William Butler Yeats, could not be known but could be
embodied. Of wisdom, I personally would affirm the reverse: We cannot embody it, yet we can be taught how
to know wisdom, whether or not it can be identified with the Truth that might
make us free.” p. 304 [What?]
2 comments:
Bloom is obviously well read and can boast a keen intellect. But his judgment of Freud inhabiting the same realms as Plato, Montaigne and Shakespeare is faulty at best and hubristic at worst. Perhaps additional passage of time will render greater clarity on this point. Maybe one of Bloom's intellectual heirs three centuries from now might have sufficient perspective to more aptly judge this matter.
Scott,
Thank you for posting. I agree with you on Freud. That he is still held up is proof that those who teach him have not read him. It is the endless problem in university classes. Professors teaching what they were taught to students who will repeat it as if they knew something about it.
I am interested to see what will become of Proust. No, I've never heard of him either.
D. Conner
Post a Comment