Here are some questions to ask Democrats who are still supporting John Kerry. Wouldn't it be nice if this country had an unbiased news media that would ask these questions directly to the Kerry Campaign? Anyway, give them a try. Any Kerry supporter who has an answer, please "let me have it".
1. Considering that the only legislation calling for the re-institutionof the draft has been put forward by Democrats. (Rep. Charles Rangel, D - NY & Sen. Fritz Hollings, D - South Carolina); that both Kerry and Edwards repeatedly mention the possible need for a draft on the campaign trail, and that John Kerry has pledged to increase the Army by two divisions (10,000 to 18,000 each) and 20,000 new special forces troops; would a President Kerry re-institute the draft? If not where does he propose to get the 56,000 new troops from?
2. Recently John Kerry likened Islamic Terrorists, bent on the destruction of Western Culture for religious reasons to organized criminals pushing gambling and prostitution for money. In light of John Kerry's past willingness to abandon the Cold War on Communism, why should the American peole believe that John Kerry has the vision to lead the War on Terror?
3. John Kerry has promised to cut the taxes of the middle class, increase spending on the military, the War in Iraq, the War in Afghanistan, and the War on Terror. Kerry has promised to provide the same healthcare benifits available to senators to all Americans, and free healthcare to all children. Kerry has promised to reduce the Medicare eligibility age to 55, fully fund "No Child Left Behind', re-institute costly federal funding for local police and fire departments, provide college tuition to all, and on and on and on!!!! When President Bush pointed out that reinstating the taxes cuts on the top 2% of American incomes, those over $200,000 per year, will not cover the bill; Kerry replied that his promises are on a pay-as-you-go contingency. Why shouldn't voters beilieve that Kerry is making promises he can't keep?
4. A VOTE FOR NADER IS A VOTE FOR HILLARY! Don't you see that a vote for Nader in 2004 is not a vote for Bush; it is a vote to make Hillary's 2008 campaign possible?
Tom...get a life.
ReplyDeletePersonal attacks are generally indicative of a lack of reasonable argumentation. Thanks for proving that to all of us.
Calling pieces of legislation by their resolution number doesn't really impress anyone. Especially since it's clear you haven't even read the bills. If you had, you'd see that, just as Lysis said, they were proposed and sponsored by left-wing Democrats and have garnered absolutely no support from either Republican or non-retarded Democrats. Yet, Kerry has decided to make this a campaign issue in order save is sinking campaign by scaring up votes from uninformed people. As the polls currently indicate, it's not working.
Cool...you signed your name to your post. You're so awesome. Seriously, dude, you're the tuffest and gnarliest internet geek around. You sure showed Lysis who I bet keeps his anonymity solely either because he's a secret agent hired by Karl Rove (or even Rove himself) and he doesn't want to draw any "official" attention in the news media as he, "small mind" and all, spreads his Hannity-like deceptions to all nine people who comment on his blog.
If he were tuff like you, he wouldn't hide behind this persona and he'd sign his actual name.
However, Tom, when people like you go online WITHOUT the cover of anonymity, they run into problems. First, everyone has a name to attach to your stupid statements and, second, no girls will talk to in chatrooms because they like more mystery with their cybersex.
You're really shooting yourself in the foot by being so open, Tom.
Tom, your first problem is that this blog was started by a brilliant teacher to start some conversation. He invited those he knew, and thus knew him, to come and join. We all know who he is, his forum name is a mere affectation. If you spend so much time roaming blogs that you fall into ones written by people unknown to you, do not blame the author because of your ignorance. Not everyone is so in need of others acceptance that they must put their entire profile onto the web.
ReplyDeleteI will, at this point, stoop to personal attacks. Only an idiot, an asinine idiot, would come onto a blog he is unfamiliar with and begin to berate the author for not revealing all of his personal info. We know who Lysis is. If you don't, so what. If you don't agree with his ideas, that is one thing, but to attack him for not putting his name on the blog.
You can take your problems with Lysis's blog and cram 'em.
Kerry has promised to provide the same healthcare benifits available to senators to all Americans, and free healthcare to all children.
ReplyDelete